Cloning and expression of antibody fragment (Fab) I: effect of expression construct and induction strategies on light and heavy chain gene expression
Title | Cloning and expression of antibody fragment (Fab) I: effect of expression construct and induction strategies on light and heavy chain gene expression |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2021 |
Authors | Mehta, D, Chirmade, T, Tungekar, AA, Gani, K, Bhambure, R |
Journal | Biochemical Engineering Journal |
Volume | 176 |
Pagination | 108189 |
Date Published | DEC |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 1369-703X |
Keywords | Dual promoter vector, Expression stoichiometry, High cell density fermentation, rHu biosimilar Ranibizumab, Transcript abundance |
Abstract | Dual promoter expression constructs offer time and cost-effective alternatives to produce multi-domain proteins like antibody fragments. This investigation is focused on understanding the effect of expression construct (dual promoter vs. co-transformation strategy), codon optimization, and induction strategies on yield and expression stoichiometry of LC and HC genes of antibody fragment at shake-flask and bioreactor scale. rHu biosimilar Ranibizumab was selected as a model protein for the study. Expression stoichiometry of HC and LC gene at mRNA level was studied using RTqPCR, whereas protein expression level was studied quantitatively using RP-HPLC and SDS-PAGE analysis. In the case of dual promoter expression construct, it was observed that LC gene cloned in the MCS1 of the duet vectors has > 2-fold expression than the HC gene, cloned in the MCS2. Transcript abundance profile of the HC and LC genes determined at different time intervals post-induction shows a difference in the gene expression at the transcriptional level. Comparative analysis of dual promoter and co-transformation strategy shows better stoichiometry in co-transformation (1:1.3), whereas higher protein yield in a dual expression system (>2.4 fold). The use of lactose and galactose as inducers show higher Fab yield of 2.30 +/- 0.03 g/L and 2.81 +/- 0.06 g/L with expression stoichiometry of 1:1.9 and 1:2 (HC: LC) respectively than IPTG-based induction with a protein yield of 1.40 +/- 0.02 g/L. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108189 |
Type of Journal (Indian or Foreign) | Foreign |
Impact Factor (IF) | 3.978 |
Divison category:
Chemical Engineering & Process Development
Add new comment