<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mane, R. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghalwadkar, Ajay A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hengne, Amol M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suryawanshi, Y. R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rode, C. V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Role of promoters in copper chromite catalysts for hydrogenolysis of glycerol</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Catalysis Today</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2-Propylene glycol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Acetol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ammonia TPD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Surface acidity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">APR</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">164</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">447-450</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Various copper chromite catalysts with and without promoters were prepared by simultaneous co-precipitation and digestion technique and the role of promoters (Al, Ba and Zn) was investigated for hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propylene glycol (1,2-PG) in both batch and continuous operations. Among various promoters studied, copper chromite catalyst with Ba as a promoter showed the highest activity and selectivity of 85% to 1,2-PG. This catalyst was found to be active for more than 800 h in a continuous operation also. Ammonia TPD results showed that barium promoted copper chromite catalyst had the highest acidity which facilitates the dehydration of glycerol to acetol which is the first step in hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-PG. The effect of barium content and variation in the promoters combination was also studied. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1st Joint International Conference of the 8th Tokyo Conference on Advanced Catalytic Science and Technology/5th Asia Pacific Congress on Catalysis, Sapporo, JAPAN, JUL 18-23, 2010</style></notes><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3.407
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rode, C. V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mane, R. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Potdar, A. S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patil, P. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Niphadkar, P. S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshi, P. N.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Copper modified waste fly ash as a promising catalyst for glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Catalysis Today</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2-Propanediol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alkali fusion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cu loading</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fly ash</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AUG</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">190</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Several catalyst formulations using waste fly ash along with Cu were prepared and characterised by XRD, BET and TEM. These catalysts were also evaluated for the first time for hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2 propanediol (1,2-PDO) in a batch reactor under 52 bar H-2 pressure in the temperature range of 473-513 K conditions. The fly ash pretreated by alkali using the fusion method and impregnated with Cu showed higher activity and stability for glycerol hydrogenolysis. Due to pretreatment with alkali at high temperature, transformation of alpha-quartz to the tridymite phase of SiO2 occurred. More importantly, use of alkali either during the pretreatment or the Cu loading step resulted in a high dispersion on the surface which was responsible for higher glycerol conversion and 1,2-PDO selectivity. The effects of temperature, Cu loading and solvent on glycerol conversion and product selectivities were also studied in this work. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2.98
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mane, R. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kondawar, S. E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Niphadkar, P. S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshi, P. N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patil, K. R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rode, C. V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Effect of preparation parameters of Cu catalysts on their physico-chemical properties and activities for glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Catalysis Today</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Co-precipitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cu catalysts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Physico-chemical properties</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Solid state fusion</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DEC</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1, SI</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">198</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">321-329</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Cu based catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation, alkali fusion followed by precipitation and direct solid state fusion methods. The changes in the phase formation, morphology, crystallite size, extent of aggregation, strength and nature of acid sites were observed due to variations in precipitating agents and also their order of addition. The catalyst prepared by co-precipitation using Na2CO3 showed the predominant presence of metallic Cu phase with a crystallite size of 5 nm, well segregated spherical morphology and highest acidity in the activated sample. These intrinsic properties contributed to achieve the highest glycerol conversion of 62% and 1,2-PDO selectivity of 88% in glycerol hydrogenolysis. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2.98
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mane, Rasika B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patil, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shirai, Masayuki</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rayalu, Sadhana S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rode, Chandrashekhar V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Influence of carbon based supports on selectivity behavior of diols and propanol in Ru catalyzed glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Catalysis B: Environmental</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">activated carbon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amorphous carbon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">catalysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol conversions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">graphite composites</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graphite supports</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hydrolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">layered structures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Particle size</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Product distributions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Propanediols</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Propanol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Selectivity behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural characteristics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural effect</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural effects</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAY</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">204</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Activated carbon (AC) and three graphite materials were studied as supports for Ru catalyzed glycerol hydrogenolysis to propanediols and 1-propanol. Structural characteristics of AC and graphite materials were found to greatly affect the reducibility and particle size of supported Ru and hence, the activity and product distribution in glycerol hydrogenolysis. XRD of graphite materials showed distinctly (002) plane having highly organized layered structure and the peak intensity decreased in the order of Ru/KS150 &amp;gt; Ru/HSAG100 &amp;gt; Ru/KS6 due to decrease in the graphite sheet thickness. In Raman, the intense D band in HSAG100 compared to that in KS6 and KS150 samples indicated its highly amorphous nature or mixed carbon hybridization. Glycerol conversion for Ru on AC was higher than that on graphite and among different graphites, it showed a descending activity order of Ru/KS6 &amp;gt; Ru/HSAG100 &amp;gt; Ru/KS150. The product distribution for AC and HSAG100 supported Ru was similar, giving 1-propanol (45%) alongwith 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PDO) (37%) and 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) (9–11%). For graphite supports, availability of Ru although bigger in size (4–5 nm), would be higher on the surface than in case of AC which formed deep hydrogenolysis products like 1-, 2- propanol, ethanol etc.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11.698</style></custom4><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">134-146</style></section></record></records></xml>