<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sandholu, Anand S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mujawar, Sharmila P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ramakrishnan, Krithika</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thulasiram, Hirekodathakallu V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kulkarni, Kiran</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural studies on 10-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase: a novel linear substrate-specific dehydrogenase from Catharanthus roseus</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iridoid biosynthesis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medium-chain dehydrogenase</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">monoterpene indole alkaloids</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reductase</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">X-ray crystallography</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SEP</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">88</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1197-1206</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Conversion of 10-hydroxygeraniol to 10-oxogeranial is a crucial step in iridoid biosynthesis. This reaction is catalyzed by a zinc-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase, 10-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase, belonging to the family of medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (MDR). Here, we report the crystal structures of a novel 10-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase from Catharanthus roseus in its apo and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP(+)) bound forms. Structural analysis and docking studies reveal how subtle conformational differences of loops L1, L2, L3, and helix alpha 9' at the orifice of the catalytic site confer differential activity of the enzyme toward various substrates, by modulating the binding pocket shape and volume. The present study, first of its kind, provides insights into the structural basis of substrate specificity of MDRs specific to linear substrates. Furthermore, comparison of apo and NADP(+) bound structures suggests that the enzyme adopts open and closed states to facilitate cofactor binding.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;2.828&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Singh, Sneha</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thulasiram, V, Hirekodathakallu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sengupta, Durba</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kulkarni, Kiran</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dynamic coupling analysis on plant sesquiterpene synthases provides leads for the identification of product specificity determinants</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">molecular dynamics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Product specificity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sesquiterpene synthases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Statistical coupling analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">X-ray crystallography</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JAN </style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">536</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">107-114</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Sesquiterpene synthases catalyse cyclisation of farnesyl pyrophosphate to produce diverse sesquiterpenes. Despite utilising the same substrate and exhibiting significant sequence and structural homology, these enzymes form different products. Previous efforts were based on identifying the effect of divergent residues present at the catalytic binding pocket on the product specificity of these enzymes. However, the rationales deduced for the product specificity from these studies were not generic enough to be applicable to other phylogenetically distant members of this family. To address this problem, we have developed a novel approach combining sequence, structural and dynamical information of plant sesquiterpene synthases (SSQs) to predict product modulating residues (PMRs). We tested this approach on the SSQs with known PMRs and also on sesquisabinene synthase 1 (SaSQS1), a SSQ from Indian sandalwood. Our results show that the dynamical sectors of SSQs obtained from molecular dynamics simulation and their hydrophobicity and vicinity indices together provide leads for the identification of PMRs. The efficacy of the technique was tested on SaSQS1 using mutagenesis. To the best of our knowledge, this is a first technique of this kind which provides cues on PMRs of SSQs, with divergent phylogenetic relationship. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3.575
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bhoite, Ashwini</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gaur, Neeraj K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palange, Megha</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kontham, Ravindar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gupta, Vidya</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kulkarni, Kiran</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structure of epoxide hydrolase 2 from Mangifera indica throws light on the substrate specificity determinants of plant epoxide hydrolases</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enantioselectivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Epoxide hydrolase</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">molecular dynamics simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regioselectivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">X-ray crystallography</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOV </style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">733</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">150444</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;
	Epoxide hydrolases (EHs) are a group of ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze hydrolysis of chemically reactive epoxides to yield corresponding dihydrodiols. Despite extensive studies on EHs from different clades, generic rules governing their substrate specificity determinants have remained elusive. Here, we present structural, biochemical and molecular dynamics simulation studies on MiEH2, a plant epoxide hydrolase from Mangifera indica. Comparative structure-function analysis of nine homologs of MiEH2, which include a few AlphaFold structural models, show that the two conserved tyrosines (MiEH2Y152 and MiEH2Y232) from the lid domain dissect substrate binding tunnel into two halves, forming substrate-binding-pocket one (BP1) and two (BP2). This compartmentalization offers diverse binding modes to their substrates, as exemplified by the binding of smaller aromatic substrates, such as styrene oxide (SO). Docking and molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the linear epoxy fatty acid substrates predominantly occupy BP1, while the aromatic substrates can bind to either BP1 or BP2. Furthermore, SO preferentially binds to BP2, by stacking against catalytically important histidine (MiEH2H297) with the conserved lid tyrosines engaging its epoxide oxygen. Residue (MiEH2L263) next to the catalytic aspartate (MiEH2D262) modulates substrate binding modes. Thus, the divergent binding modes correlate with the differential affinities of the EHs for their substrates. Furthermore, long-range dynamical coupling between the lid and core domains critically influences substrate enantioselectivity in plant EHs.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;
	Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;
	3.1&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom4></record></records></xml>