<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sengupta, Durba</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonar, Krushna</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshi, Manali</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Characterizing clinically relevant natural variants of GPCRs using computational approaches</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Methods in cell biology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important class of drug targets owing to their physiological role. A large number of clinically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been observed in GPCRs that are linked to disease susceptibility and adverse drug response. It is therefore important to characterize the variants in order to improve GPCR therapeutics. Here, we discuss computational methods coupling molecular dynamics simulations with docking and free energy calculations to characterize the functional differences in GPCR variants. The hallmark of this approach is the explicit incorporation of receptor and membrane dynamics that allows us to analyze short- and long-range effects in the variant receptors. We use the SNPs reported in β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) as a test case and highlight the recent successes in analyzing structural and dynamic differences in a series of population variants. The computational approach we discuss here has a twofold benefit: it helps to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying hypo- or hyperfunctionality of variant receptors as well as prioritizing novel variants that must be experimentally tested.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kharche, Shalmali</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshi, Manali</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chattopadhyay, Amitabha</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sengupta, Durba</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conformational plasticity and dynamic interactions of the N-terminal domain of the chemokine receptor CXCR1</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Plos Computational Biology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAY</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(33, 33, 33); font-family: BlinkMacSystemFont, -apple-system, &amp;quot;Segoe UI&amp;quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &amp;quot;Fira Sans&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Droid Sans&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Helvetica Neue&amp;quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400;&quot;&gt;The dynamic interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their cognate protein partners are central to several cell signaling pathways. For example, the association of CXC chemokine receptor 1 (CXCR1) with its cognate chemokine, interleukin-8 (IL8 or CXCL8) initiates pathways leading to neutrophil-mediated immune responses. The N-terminal domain of chemokine receptors confers ligand selectivity, but unfortunately the conformational dynamics of this intrinsically disordered region remains unresolved. In this work, we have explored the interaction of CXCR1 with IL8 by microsecond time scale coarse-grain simulations, complemented by atomistic models and NMR chemical shift predictions. We show that the conformational plasticity of the apo-receptor N-terminal domain is restricted upon ligand binding, driving it to an open C-shaped conformation. Importantly, we corroborated the dynamic complex sampled in our simulations against chemical shift perturbations reported by previous NMR studies and show that the trends are similar. Our results indicate that chemical shift perturbation is often not a reporter of residue contacts in such dynamic associations. We believe our results represent a step forward in devising a strategy to understand intrinsically disordered regions in GPCRs and how they acquire functionally important conformational ensembles in dynamic protein-protein interfaces.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4.475</style></custom4></record></records></xml>