<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shrinivas, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kulkarni, Rahul P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shaikh, Saif</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghorpade, Ravindra V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vyas, Renu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tambe, Sanjeev S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ponrathnam, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prediction of reactivity ratios in free radical copolymerization from monomer resonance-polarity (Q-e) parameters: genetic programming-based models</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alfrey-Price scheme</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">free radical copolymerization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">genetic programming</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reactivity ratio</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">symbolic regression</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FEB</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GENTHINER STRASSE 13, D-10785 BERLIN, GERMANY</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">361-372</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The principal deficiency of the widely utilized Alfrey-Price (AP) scheme for computing reactivity ratios in the widely used free radical copolymerization is that it ignores important factors, such as the steric effects. This often leads to inaccurate reactivity ratio predictions by AP model. Accordingly, in this study, exclusively data-driven, Q-e parameter-based new models have been developed for the reactivity ratio prediction in free radical copolymerization. In the model development, a novel artificial intelligence formalism known as ``genetic programming (GP)'' that performs symbolic regression has been employed. The GP-based models possess a different functional form than AP model. Further, parameters of GP-based models were fine-tuned using Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) nonlinear regression method. A comparison of AP, GP and GP-LM as well as artificial neural network (ANN)-based models indicates that GP and GP-LM models exhibit superior reactivity ratio prediction accuracy and generalization performance (with correlation coefficient magnitudes close to or greater than 0.9) when compared with AP and ANN models. The GPbased reactivity ratio prediction models developed here due to their higher accuracy and generalization capability have the potential of replacing the widely used AP models.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0.759</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Goel, Purva</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saurabh, Kumar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patil-Shinde, Veena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tambe, Sanjeev S.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prediction of degrees API values of crude oils by use of saturates/aromatics/resins/ asphaltenes analysis: computational-intelligence-based models</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPE Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JUN</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">817-853</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The degrees API value is an important physicochemical characteristic of crude oils often used in determining their properties and quality. There exist models-predominantly linear ones-for predicting the degrees API magnitude from the molecular composition of a crude oil. This approach is tedious and time-consuming because it requires quantitative determination of numerous crude-oil components. Usually, the hydrocarbons present in a crude oil are grouped according to their molecular average structures into saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) fractions. An degrees API-value prediction model dependent on these four fractions is relatively easier to develop, although this approach has been rarely used. A rigorous scrutiny suggests that some of the dependencies between the individual SARA fractions and the corresponding degrees API value could be nonlinear. Accordingly, in this study, SARA-fraction-based nonlinear models have been developed for the prediction of values using three computational-intelligence (CI) formalisms: genetic programming (GP), artificialneural networks (ANNs), and support-vector regression (SVR). The SARA analyses and degrees API values of 403 crude-oil samples covering wide ranges have been used in developing these models. A comparison of the CI-based models with an existing linear model indicates that all the former class of models possess a significantly better degrees API-value prediction and generalization performance than those exhibited by the linear model. Also, the SVR-based model has been found to be the most accurate degrees API-value predictor. Because of their better prediction accuracy, CI-based models can be gainfully used to predict degrees API values of crude oils.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1.442</style></custom4></record></records></xml>