<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deshpande, Pooja S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chaudhari, Vijay R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prasad, Bhagavatula L. V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mechanistic aspects of methanol electro-oxidation reaction through cyclic voltammetry: is it correct to blame carbon monoxide for catalyst poisoning?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Technology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">carbon monoxide</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyclic voltammetry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">electrocatalysts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">electrode poisoning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Methanol oxidation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAY</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1900955</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The mechanism of the methanol oxidation reaction is revisited using systematic cyclic voltammetric studies. These studies clearly indicate that the peak during the cathodic scan belongs mainly to electro-oxidation of the carbon monoxide, and that only a fraction of this carbon monoxide remains adsorbed on the electrode, contrary to what previous reports suggested. More details can be found in article number by Bhagavatula L. V. Prasad and co-workers.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;3.404&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deshpande, Pooja S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Radhakrishnan, Thulasi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prasad, Bhagavatula L. V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Establishing a new efficiency descriptor for methanol oxidation reaction and its validation with commercially available Pt-based catalysts</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fuel Cells</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">catalyst poisoning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CO tolerance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">direct methanol fuel cells</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">electrocatalysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Methanol oxidation reaction</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JUN</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) have received a lot of attention in recent years as promising technology for generating clean and efficient energy. In DMFC, the anode catalyst is a vital component because it is involved in the oxidation of methanol, which produces electrons that can be used as an energy source. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is commonly used to test the characteristics of the electrode materials before they are employed in the actual fuel cell. Interestingly in the case of DMFCs CV also is a useful technique to obtain vital information about the performance and expected efficiency of the electrodes. In general, the CV of methanol electrooxidation for Pt-based catalysts has two peaks, If in the forward scan (anodic scan) and Ib in the backward scan (cathodic scan). The ratio of these two peaks (If/Ib) is the most commonly used criterion for investigating CO poisoning in catalysts. However, there is a great deal of ambiguity surrounding this criterion, owing to the genesis of Ib. Addressing this we present here a new criterion to evaluate the efficiency of the catalyst using the same CV technique. We validate this newly proposed criterion with commercial Pt/C (comm. Pt/C) and other commercially available alloy catalysts.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;
	Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;
	2.8&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom4></record></records></xml>