<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sharma, Aakash</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kumaraswamy, Guruswamy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thakre, Shirish</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Modeling the universal viscoelastic response of polymer fibers</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Physical Review Materials</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JUN</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">062601</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Polymer fibers, including natural silk and synthetic fibers, exhibit universal viscoelastic response. On stretching below yield, they show logarithmic stress decay. On unloading fibers with a glassy amorphous phase, the stress recovers. A simple phenomenological model accurately describes data from independent mechanical experiments and provides insights into the micro structural origins of the fiber response. Counter to intuition, the model indicates that it is the crystalline regions, rather than the amorphous glass, that deform first on stretching fibers at high strain rates. On holding a stretched fiber, stress decays as a consequence of relaxations in amorphous regions. Finally, unloading the fiber transfers stress from the amorphous to crystalline regions resulting in stress recovery. Model parameters correlate well with the fiber microstructure. Crystal and amorphous moduli from the model match those from x-ray diffraction. Activation energies for the temperature dependence of the peak relaxation time are similar to those reported in the literature. Thus, a simple model that invokes only crystal-amorphous coexistence can successfully model the mechanical response of a wide variety of polymer fibers.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0.259</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sharma, Aakash</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thakre, Shirish</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kumaraswamy, Guruswamy</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Microstructural differences between Viscose and Lyocell revealed by in-situ studies of wet and dry fibers</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cellulose</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">birefringence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crystal-amorphous orientation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In-situ WAXD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regenerated cellulose</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FEB</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1195-1206</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Regenerated cellulose fibers manufactured using Lyocell and Viscose processes exhibit differences in their structural response to mechanical deformation. Here, we study the effect of stretching and stress relaxation on the orientation of crystal and amorphous phases. Our results show that on stretching, orientation in both crystal and amorphous phases increases linearly with strain, correlating with the increase in stress and with the stretching of the crystalline unit cell along the c-axis. On holding after stretching to a particular strain, the stress relaxes logarithmically in time, correlating with a decrease in the strain along the c-axis of the crystal unit cell. The stress relaxation is also correlated with a logarithmic increase in amorphous orientation, while crystalline orientation stays constant. We attribute the stress development during stretching to deformation of the crystal unit cell, while crystal reorientation in the fiber direction results in increase in the crystalline orientation parameter. On holding the fiber at a fixed total strain, the stress relaxes as strain is transferred from crystal to amorphous regions. Thus, the strain on the unit cell c-axis decreases and amorphous orientation increases. There are quantitative differences between the rate of increase in amorphous phase orientation during stress relaxation for Lyocell and Viscose fibers. For dry fibers, Lyocell shows a slower increase in orientation during stress relaxation. On wetting the fibers, their structural response changes qualitatively. We combine wide angle x ray diffraction and birefringence experiments with our model to infer that that on stretching the wet fiber, the crystalline phase is neither strained nor oriented. However, orientation develops in the amorphous phase. During stress relaxation in wet condition, Lyocell fibers shows a faster increase in amorphous orientation than Viscose fibers, in line with the comparison of relaxation time spectra for wet Viscose and Lyocell fibers. Graphic abstract&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Foreign&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;4.210&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom4></record></records></xml>