<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mane, Rasika B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patil, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shirai, Masayuki</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rayalu, Sadhana S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rode, Chandrashekhar V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Influence of carbon based supports on selectivity behavior of diols and propanol in Ru catalyzed glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Catalysis B: Environmental</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">activated carbon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amorphous carbon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">catalysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol conversions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glycerol hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">graphite composites</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graphite supports</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hydrogenolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hydrolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">layered structures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Particle size</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Product distributions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Propanediols</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Propanol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Selectivity behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural characteristics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural effect</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Structural effects</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAY</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">204</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Activated carbon (AC) and three graphite materials were studied as supports for Ru catalyzed glycerol hydrogenolysis to propanediols and 1-propanol. Structural characteristics of AC and graphite materials were found to greatly affect the reducibility and particle size of supported Ru and hence, the activity and product distribution in glycerol hydrogenolysis. XRD of graphite materials showed distinctly (002) plane having highly organized layered structure and the peak intensity decreased in the order of Ru/KS150 &amp;gt; Ru/HSAG100 &amp;gt; Ru/KS6 due to decrease in the graphite sheet thickness. In Raman, the intense D band in HSAG100 compared to that in KS6 and KS150 samples indicated its highly amorphous nature or mixed carbon hybridization. Glycerol conversion for Ru on AC was higher than that on graphite and among different graphites, it showed a descending activity order of Ru/KS6 &amp;gt; Ru/HSAG100 &amp;gt; Ru/KS150. The product distribution for AC and HSAG100 supported Ru was similar, giving 1-propanol (45%) alongwith 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PDO) (37%) and 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) (9–11%). For graphite supports, availability of Ru although bigger in size (4–5 nm), would be higher on the surface than in case of AC which formed deep hydrogenolysis products like 1-, 2- propanol, ethanol etc.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foreign</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11.698</style></custom4><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">134-146</style></section></record></records></xml>