02882nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245010300055210006900158260005700227300001200284490000600296520197700302653002802279653003102307653001802338653002402356653002502380653002602405100002302431700001502454700001802469700001802487856012302505       2014                        eng d  a1939-123400aPrediction of higher heating value of solid biomass fuels using artificial intelligence formalisms0 aPrediction of higher heating value of solid biomass fuels using   a233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USAbSPRINGERcJUN  a681-6920 v73 a<p>The higher heating value (HHV) is an important property defining the energy content of biomass fuels. A number of proximate and/or ultimate analysis based predominantly linear correlations have been proposed for predicting the HHV of biomass fuels. A scrutiny of the relationships between the constituents of the proximate and ultimate analyses and the corresponding HHVs suggests that all relationships are not linear and thus nonlinear models may be more appropriate. Accordingly, a novel artificial intelligence (AI) formalism, namely genetic programming (GP) has been employed for the first time for developing two biomass HHV prediction models, respectively using the constituents of the proximate and ultimate analyses as the model inputs. The prediction and generalization performance of these models was compared rigorously with the corresponding multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network based as also currently available high-performing linear and nonlinear HHV models. This comparison reveals that the HHV prediction performance of the GP and MLP models is consistently better than that of their existing linear and/or nonlinear counterparts. Specifically, the GP- and MLP-based models exhibit an excellent overall prediction accuracy and generalization performance with high (&gt; 0.95) magnitudes of the coefficient of correlation and low (&lt; 4.5 %) magnitudes of mean absolute percentage error in respect of the experimental and model-predicted HHVs. It is also found that the proximate analysis-based GP model has outperformed all the existing high-performing linear biomass HHV prediction models. In the case of ultimate analysis-based HHV models, the MLP model has exhibited best prediction accuracy and generalization performance when compared with the existing linear and nonlinear models. The AI-based models introduced in this paper due to their excellent performance have the potential to replace the existing biomass HHV prediction models.</p>10aArtificial intelligence10aArtificial neural networks10aBiomass fuels10agenetic programming10aHigher heating value10aMultilayer perceptron1 aGhugare, Suhas, B.1 aTiwary, S.1 aElangovan, V.1 aTambe, S., S.  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/prediction-higher-heating-value-solid-biomass-fuels-using-artificial-intelligence-002503nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245014800055210007100203260000800274300000900282490000700291520147100298653003101769653002001800653003101820653002701851653002401878653003001902100002001932700002301952700002401975700001601999700001902015700001802034700002302052856013802075       2018                        eng d  a1877-264100aCo-gasification of high ash coal–biomass blends in a fluidized bed gasifier: experimental study and computational intelligence-based modeling0 aCogasification of high ash coal–biomass blends in a fluidized be  cJUN  a1-190 v113 aCo-gasification (COG) is a clean-coal technology that uses a binary blend of coal and biomass for generating the product gas; it is environment-friendly since it emits lesser quantities of pollutants compared to the coal gasification process. Although coals found in many countries contain high percentages of ash, co-gasification studies involving such coals, and the process modeling thereof, are rare. Accordingly, this study presents results of the co-gasification experiments conducted in a fluidized-bed gasifier (FBG) pilot plant using as a feed the blends of high ash Indian coals with three biomasses, namely, rice husk, press mud, and sawdust. Since the underlying physicochemical phenomena are complex and nonlinear, modeling of the COG process has been performed using three computational intelligence (CI)-based methods namely, genetic programming, artificial neural networks, and support vector regression. Each of these formalisms was employed separately to develop models predicting four COG performance variables, namely, total gas yield, carbon conversion efficiency, heating value of product gas, and cold gas efficiency. All the CI-based models exhibit an excellent prediction accuracy and generalization performance. The co-gasification experiments and their modeling presented here for a pilot-plant FBG can be gainfully utilized in the efficient design and operation of the corresponding commercial scale co-gasifiers utilizing high ash coals.10aArtificial neural networks10aCo-gasification10aComputational intelligence10aFluidized bed gasifier10agenetic programming10asupport vector regression1 aTiwary, Shishir1 aGhugare, Suhas, B.1 aChavan, Prakash, D.1 aSaha, Sujan1 aDatta, Sudipta1 aSahu, Gajanan1 aTambe, Sanjeev, S.  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/co-gasification-high-ash-coal%E2%80%93biomass-blends-fluidized-bed-gasifier-experimental-study-and