02724nas a2200301   4500008004100000022001400041245010000055210006900155260006700224300001000291490000700301520169800308653000802006653002002014653002102034653000802055653002602063653000802089653001902097100002702116700002502143700002202168700001902190700003602209700002702245700002202272856012802294       2011                        eng d  a0008-403400aCFD simulation of stirred tanks: comparison of turbulence models. part I: radial flow impellers0 aCFD simulation of stirred tanks comparison of turbulence models   a111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USAbWILEY-BLACKWELLcFEB  a23-820 v893 a<p>A critical review of the published literature regarding the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of single-phase turbulent flow in stirred tank reactors is presented. In this part of review, CFD simulations of radial flow impellers (mainly disc turbine (DT)) in a fully baffled vessel operating in a turbulent regime have been presented. Simulated results obtained with different impeller modelling approaches (impeller boundary condition, multiple reference frame, computational snap shot and the sliding mesh approaches) and different turbulence models (standard k-epsilon model, RNG k-epsilon model, the Reynolds stress model (RSM) and large eddy simulation) have been compared with the in-house laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) experimental data. In addition, recently proposed modifications to the standard k-epsilon models were also evaluated. The model predictions (of all the mean velocities, turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate) have been compared with the experimental measurements at various locations in the tank. A discussion is presented to highlight strengths and weaknesses of currently used CFD models. A preliminary analysis of sensitivity of modelling assumptions in the k-epsilon models and RSM has been carried out using LES database. The quantitative comparison of exact and modelled turbulence production, transport and dissipation terms has highlighted the reasons behind the partial success of various modifications of standard k-epsilon model as well as RSM. The volume integral of predicted energy dissipation rate is compared with the energy input rate. Based on these results, suggestions have been made for the future work in this area.</p>10aCFD10aimpeller models10ak-epsilon models10aLES10aradial flow impellers10aRSM10astirred vessel1 aJoshi, Jyeshtharaj, B.1 aNere, Nandkishor, K.1 aRane, Chinmay, V.1 aMurthy, B., N.1 aMathpati, Channamallikarjun, S.1 aPatwardhan, Ashwin, W.1 aRanade, Vivek, V.  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/cfd-simulation-stirred-tanks-comparison-turbulence-models-part-i-radial-flow-impellers-002396nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245014800055210006900203260007600272300001200348490000700360520135100367653002501718653000801743653002001751653001901771653002201790100002701812700002501839700002201864700001901886700003601905700002701941700002201968856012801990       2011                        eng d  a0008-403400aCFD simulation of stirred tanks: comparison of turbulence models (Part II: axial flow impellers, multiple impellers and multiphase dispersions)0 aCFD simulation of stirred tanks comparison of turbulence models   aCOMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USAbWILEY-BLACKWELLcAUG  a754-8160 v893 a<p>In the first part of the review, published literature regarding the CFD modelling of single-phase turbulent flow in stirred tank reactors with radial flow impellers was critically analysed. A brief overview of different turbulence models (standard k-epsilon model, RNG k-epsilon model, the Reynolds stress model and large eddy simulation) as well as impeller baffle interaction models has been presented in the previous part. This part is concerned with the review of literature regarding CFD simulation of axial flow impellers. Comprehensive simulations have been carried out using various turbulence models and the model predictions (of all the mean velocities, turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate) have been compared with the experimental measurements at various locations in the tank. The strengths and weaknesses of various turbulence models for axial flow impellers is presented. The quantitative comparison of exact and modelled turbulence production, transport and dissipation terms has highlighted the reasons behind the partial success of various modifications of standard k-e model as well as Reynolds stress model. Literature efforts on multiple impeller systems and multiphase systems have been discussed in a separate section. Based on these results, suggestions have been made for the future work in this area.</p>10aaxial flow impellers10aCFD10aimpeller models10astirred vessel10aturbulence models1 aJoshi, Jyeshtharaj, B.1 aNere, Nandkishor, K.1 aRane, Chinmay, V.1 aMurthy, B., N.1 aMathpati, Channamallikarjun, S.1 aPatwardhan, Ashwin, W.1 aRanade, Vivek, V.  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/cfd-simulation-stirred-tanks-comparison-turbulence-models-part-ii-axial-flow-impellers-0