02256nas a2200169   4500008004100000245010000041210006900141260000900210300000800219490000600227520165300233100002101886700002201907700002001929700002001949856011701969       2024                        eng d00aDishevelled2 activates WGEF via its interaction with a unique internal peptide motif of the GEF0 aDishevelled2 activates WGEF via its interaction with a unique in  cMAY   a5430 v73 a<p>
	The Wnt-planar cell polarity (Wnt-PCP) pathway is crucial in establishing cell polarity during development and tissue homoeostasis. This pathway is found to be dysregulated in many pathological conditions, including cancer and autoimmune disorders. The central event in Wnt-PCP pathway is the activation of Weak-similarity guanine nucleotide exchange factor (WGEF) by the adapter protein Dishevelled (Dvl). The PDZ domain of Dishevelled2 (Dvl2PDZ) binds and activates WGEF by releasing it from its autoinhibitory state. However, the actual Dvl2PDZ binding site of WGEF and the consequent activation mechanism of the GEF have remained elusive. Using biochemical and molecular dynamics studies, we show that a unique ``internal-PDZ binding motif'' (IPM) of WGEF mediates the WGEF-Dvl2PDZ interaction to activate the GEF. The residues at P 2 , P 0 , P -2 and P -3 positions of IPM play an important role in stabilizing the WGEFpep-Dvl2PDZ interaction. Furthermore, MD simulations of modelled Dvl2PDZ-WGEFIPM peptide complexes suggest that WGEF-Dvl2PDZ interaction may differ from the reported Dvl2PDZ-IPM interactions. Additionally, the apo structure of human Dvl2PDZ shows conformational dynamics different from its IPM peptide bound state, suggesting an induced fit mechanism for the Dvl2PDZ-peptide interaction. The current study provides a model for Dvl2 induced activation of WGEF. This study identifies a unique ``internal-PDZ binding motif'' (IPM) of WGEF that mediates its interaction with Dvl2PDZ, leading to the release of GEF from its autoinhibitory state. It further unravels the underlying mutual Dvl2-IPM recognition aspects.</p>
1 aOmble, Aishwarya1 aMahajan, Shrutika1 aBhoite, Ashwini1 aKulkarni, Kiran  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/dishevelled2-activates-wgef-its-interaction-unique-internal-peptide-motif-gef02559nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245014200055210006900197260000900266300001100275490000800286520163300294653002301927653002201950653003401972653002102006653002602027100002002053700002102073700001902094700002202113700001702135700002002152856012102172       2024                        eng d  a0006-291X00aStructure of epoxide hydrolase 2 from Mangifera indica throws light on the substrate specificity determinants of plant epoxide hydrolases0 aStructure of epoxide hydrolase 2 from Mangifera indica throws li  cNOV   a1504440 v7333 a<p>
	Epoxide hydrolases (EHs) are a group of ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze hydrolysis of chemically reactive epoxides to yield corresponding dihydrodiols. Despite extensive studies on EHs from different clades, generic rules governing their substrate specificity determinants have remained elusive. Here, we present structural, biochemical and molecular dynamics simulation studies on MiEH2, a plant epoxide hydrolase from Mangifera indica. Comparative structure-function analysis of nine homologs of MiEH2, which include a few AlphaFold structural models, show that the two conserved tyrosines (MiEH2Y152 and MiEH2Y232) from the lid domain dissect substrate binding tunnel into two halves, forming substrate-binding-pocket one (BP1) and two (BP2). This compartmentalization offers diverse binding modes to their substrates, as exemplified by the binding of smaller aromatic substrates, such as styrene oxide (SO). Docking and molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the linear epoxy fatty acid substrates predominantly occupy BP1, while the aromatic substrates can bind to either BP1 or BP2. Furthermore, SO preferentially binds to BP2, by stacking against catalytically important histidine (MiEH2H297) with the conserved lid tyrosines engaging its epoxide oxygen. Residue (MiEH2L263) next to the catalytic aspartate (MiEH2D262) modulates substrate binding modes. Thus, the divergent binding modes correlate with the differential affinities of the EHs for their substrates. Furthermore, long-range dynamical coupling between the lid and core domains critically influences substrate enantioselectivity in plant EHs.</p>
10aEnantioselectivity10aEpoxide hydrolase10amolecular dynamics simulation10aRegioselectivity10aX-ray crystallography1 aBhoite, Ashwini1 aGaur, Neeraj, K.1 aPalange, Megha1 aKontham, Ravindar1 aGupta, Vidya1 aKulkarni, Kiran  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/structure-epoxide-hydrolase-2-mangifera-indica-throws-light-substrate-specificity