01871nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245012000055210006900175260013100244300000900375490000700384520101500391653001601406653001401422653001001436653002101446653002201467100002001489700001801509856012601527       2007                        eng d  a0972-853800aEffect of auxin types on in vitro and ex vitro rooting and acclimatization of grapevine as influenced by substrates0 aEffect of auxin types on in vitro and ex vitro rooting and accli  aDIV FRUITS & HORTICULTURAL TECHNOL, INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INST, NEW DELHI, 110 012, INDIAbHORTICULTURAL SOC INDIAcMAR  a5-110 v643 a<p>Transferring micropropagated plantlets from in vitro to in vivo conditions is a critical step because plantlets have under-developed cuticle and stomata which result in wilting due to low humidity, fungal attack and bleaching in high light intensities. The resumption of terminal growth indicates successful establishment which is a change from mixotrophy to autotrophy. The survival of Vitis vinifera cvs. 2A-Clone and Red Globe plantlets rooted in vitro was 86.66 and 83.33%, respectively and the established plants showed a well-defined root system. Plantlets rooted in vivo by auxin pulse were easier to transfer and acclimatize with a survival percentage of 96.66 and 79.92 for 2A-Clone and Red Globe, respectively but the rooting was of fibrous type with few main roots and less number of root hairs. Coco-peat in combination with sand and soil was better for quick acclimatization and establishment (97.5 and 95% survival for 2A-Clone and Red Globe respectively) of the micropropagated plantlets.</p>10aauxin pulse10acoco-peat10agrape10amicropropagation10aplantlet survival1 aBarreto, M., S.1 aNookaraju, A.  uhttps://library.ncl.res.in/content/effect-auxin-types-vitro-and-ex-vitro-rooting-and-acclimatization-grapevine-influenced