@article { ISI:000303366000001,
	title = {Polymorphs, salts, and cocrystals: what{\textquoteright}s in a name?},
	journal = {Crystal Growth \& Design},
	volume = {12},
	number = {5},
	year = {2012},
	month = {MAY},
	pages = {2147-2152},
	publisher = {AMER CHEMICAL SOC},
	address = {1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA},
	abstract = {<p>The December 2011 release of a draft United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance concerning regulatory classification of pharmaceutical cocrystals of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) addressed two matters of topical interest to the crystal engineering and pharmaceutical science communities: (1) a proposed definition of cocrystals; (2) a proposed classification of pharmaceutical cocrystals as dissociable {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}API-excipient{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} molecular complexes. The Indo U.S. Bilateral Meeting sponsored by the Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum titled The Evolving Role of Solid State Chemistry in Pharmaceutical Science was held in Manesar near Delhi, India, from February 2-4, 2012. A session of the meeting was devoted to discussion of the FDA guidance draft. The debate generated strong consensus on the need to define cocrystals more broadly and to classify them like salts. It was also concluded that the diversity of API crystal forms makes it difficult to classify solid forms into three categories that are mutually exclusive. This perspective summarizes the discussion in the Indo-U.S. Bilateral Meeting and includes contributions from researchers who were not participants in the meeting.</p>},
	issn = {1528-7483},
	doi = {10.1021/cg3002948},
	author = {Aitipamula, Srinivasulu and Banerjee, Rahul and Bansal, Arvind K. and Biradha, Kumar and Cheney, Miranda L. and Choudhury, Angshuman Roy and Desiraju, Gautam R. and Dikundwar, Amol G. and Dubey, Ritesh and Duggirala, Nagakiran and Ghogale, Preetam P. and Ghosh, Soumyajit and Goswami, Pramod Kumar and Goud, N. Rajesh and Jetti, Ram R. K. R. and Karpinski, Piotr and Kaushik, Poonam and Kumar, Dinesh and Kumar, Vineet and Moulton, Brian and Mukherjee, Arijit and Mukherjee, Gargi and Myerson, Allan S. and Puri, Vibha and Ramanan, Arunachalam and Rajamannar, T. and Reddy, C. Malla and Rodriguez-Hornedo, Nair and Rogers, Robin D. and Row, T. N. Guru and Sanphui, Palash and Shan, Ning and Shete, Ganesh and Singh, Amit and Sun, Changquan C. and Swift, Jennifer A. and Thaimattam, Ram and Thakur, Tejender S. and Thaper, Rajesh Kumar and Thomas, Sajesh P. and Tothadi, Srinu and Vangala, Venu R. and Variankaval, Narayan and Vishweshwar, Peddy and Weyna, David R. and Zaworotko, Michael J.}
}
@article { ISI:000306942300059,
	title = {Polymorphs, salts and cocrystals: what{\textquoteright}s in a name? (vol 12, pg 2147, 2012)},
	journal = {Crystal Growth \& Design},
	volume = {12},
	number = {8},
	year = {2012},
	month = {AUG},
	pages = {4290-4291},
	publisher = {AMER CHEMICAL SOC},
	address = {1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA},
	issn = {1528-7483},
	doi = {10.1021/cg300704b},
	author = {Aitipamula, Srinivasulu and Banerjee, Rahul and Bansal, Arvind K. and Biradha, Kumar and Cheney, Miranda L. and Choudhury, Angshuman Roy and Desiraju, Gautam R. and Dikundwar, Amol G. and Dubey, Ritesh and Duggirala, Nagakiran and Ghogale, Preetam P. and Ghosh, Soumyajit and Goswami, Pramod Kumar and Goud, N. Rajesh and Jetti, Ram R. K. R. and Karpinski, Piotr and Kaushik, Poonam and Kumar, Dinesh and Kumar, Vineet and Moulton, Brian and Mukherjee, Arijit and Mukherjee, Gargi and Myerson, Allan S. and Puri, Vibha and Ramanan, Arunachalam and Rajamannar, T. and Reddy, C. Malla and Rodriguez-Hornedo, Nair and Rogers, Robin D. and Row, T. N. Guru and Sanphui, Palash and Shan, Ning and Shete, Ganesh and Singh, Amit and Sun, Changquan C. and Swift, Jennifer A. and Thaimattam, Ram and Thakur, Tejender S. and Thaper, Rajesh Kumar and Thomas, Sajesh P. and Tothadi, Srinu and Vangala, Venu R. and Vishweshwar, Peddy and Weyna, David R. and Zaworotko, Michael J.}
}
@article {44174,
	title = {Resolution of the identity and cholesky representation of EOM-MP2 approximation: implementation, accuracy and efficiency},
	journal = {Journal of Chemical Sciences},
	volume = {129},
	year = {2017},
	month = {OCT},
	pages = {1611-1626},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {We present a Resolution of Identity and Cholesky Decomposition Based Implementation of EOM-MP2 approximation. The RI and CD based EOM-MP2 shows significant speed-up and less storage requirement than the conventional canonical version and can be applied to very large systems. The new algorithm used for this implementation eliminates the most storage requiring four-index quantities resulting in the decrease of storage requirement, reduction in I/O penalties and improved parallel performance, at the expense of more floating point operations. Therefore, the speed-up compared to conventional EOM-MP2 method is more prominent in case of EA, EE and SF case where the storage bottleneck is significant than the EOM-IP-MP2 method, where the storage requirement is significantly less. However, the RI/CD based EOM-IP-MP2 can be coupled with frozen natural orbitals to gain further speed-up.},
	keywords = {CC, CD, Cholesky decomposition, EA, EE, electron attachment, electron correlation, EOM, equation-of-motion, excited state, ionization, IP, MP2, Resolution-of-identity, RI, SF, spinflip},
	issn = {0974-3626},
	doi = {10.1007/s12039-017-1378-z},
	author = {Kumar, Dinesh and Dutta, Achintya Kumar and Manohar, Prashant Uday}
}
