@article {47101,
	title = {Scalable and thin film approach for solar hydrogen generation: a review on enhanced photocatalytic water splitting},
	journal = {Journal of Materials Chemistry A},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2021},
	month = {JAN},
	pages = {1353-1371},
	type = {Review},
	abstract = {<p>Although nearly five decades of efforts have gone into solar water splitting (SWS), still success eludes and there is no big breakthrough till date. While huge importance is given either individually or concurrently to the three fundamental steps, namely, light absorption, charge carrier separation and diffusion and charge utilization at redox sites, many aspects that are practically helpful to improve the efficiency are not widely discussed and practised. Nonetheless, by adopting a number of small, but significant changes, solar hydrogen production can be enhanced. The present review discusses such different approaches employed for photocatalytic water splitting reported in the literature. For example, an increase of up to two orders of magnitude in solar hydrogen generation was observed with a film form compared to the particulate form of the same catalyst. Discussion on various approaches of enhanced hydrogen production under sunlight and one sun conditions is the main focus of this review, in particular with thin-film forms. The merits and demerits of thin film and particulate methods, respectively, are addressed in detail. Potential methods and successful stories on scalability are also discussed in the present review. In contrast to charge collection over a long distance in solar cell-based methods, a film-based method discussed shows that the local charge utilisation at a zero applied potential is an attractive feature for SWS. A comparison is provided between the PEC-WS and SWS for solar hydrogen generation, and how far we are from the reality to produce solar hydrogen on an industrial scale. We believe the presently practised diverse evaluation efforts may be truncated to fewer methods such as film-based evaluation and in a focussed manner to tackle the SWS issue towards sustainable production of solar hydrogen.</p>
},
	issn = {2050-7488},
	doi = {10.1039/d0ta09619a},
	author = {Gopinath, Chinnakonda S. and Nalajala, Naresh}
}
@article {48273,
	title = {Selective and generic photocatalytic oxidation of alcohol with Pd-TiO2 thin films: butanols to butanal/butanone with different morphologies of Pd and 0.5 theta(Pt)-Pd counterparts},
	journal = {Chemistry-An Asian Journal},
	volume = {18},
	year = {2023},
	month = {MAR},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {<p>The present study reports on the photocatalytic oxidation of butanols to butanal/butanone using thin film form of facet-dependent nano-Pd supported on commercial TiO2 under one-sun condition and demonstrates the generic nature. Pd-nanocube (Pd-NC(100)), Pd-truncated octahedron (Pd-TO (100) and (111)), polycrystalline (Pd-PC), and their counterparts with half-a-monolayer Pt-coated on Pd (0.5 theta(Pt)-Pd)) have been used as co-catalyst. A potentially scalable thin film form of Pd/TiO2 photocatalyst, prepared by drop-casting method, has been employed to study oxidation of n-butanol, 2-butanol, and iso-butanol to corresponding aldehyde/ketone. 100\% selectivity is demonstrated to respective aldehyde/ketone with any catalyst used in the present study with varying degree of butanols conversion by NMR. 0.5 theta(Pt)-Pd-TO/TiO2 shows the highest conversion of 2-butanol to butanone (13.6\% in 4 h). Continuous 10 h of reaction with the most active 0.5 theta(Pt)-Pd-TO/P25 catalyst demonstrates 31\% conversion of 2-butanol to butanone, and catalyst recyclability has been demonstrated. The present protocol can be scalable to large scales to maximize the conversion in direct sunlight. Due to its generic nature, the current method can also be applied to many other alcohols and substrate molecules.</p>
},
	keywords = {energy conversion, Nanomaterials, Oxidation, Photocatalysis, Sustainability},
	issn = {1861-4728},
	doi = {10.1002/asia.202201239},
	author = {Salgaonkar, Kranti N. and Kale, Sandip R. and Nalajala, Naresh and Mansuri, Sayana and Gopinath, Chinnakonda S.}
}
