@article {42857,
	title = {Is there any real effect of low dimensional morphologies towards light harvesting? a case study of Au-rGO-TiO2 nanocomposites},
	journal = {Chemistry Select },
	volume = {1},
	year = {2016},
	month = {APR},
	pages = {917{\textendash}923},
	abstract = {<p>Nanotube and nanosheet morphologies have been celebrated for their electron transport properties. Present work has been explored to exploit the same by combining 1D TiO2 nanotube (1D-TN) with 2D reduced graphene oxide (rGO) along with nano gold for visible light sensitization for photocatalytic H2 generation under one sun condition and visible light (λ>= 400 nm). Vertical and horizontal electron transport in 1D-TN and rGO, respectively, is combined with the visible light absorption capability of Au nanoparticle. H2 yield (HY) varies between 100 and 655 {\textmu}mol/g.h with an apparent quantum yield between 0.45 and 3.2 \%, respectively, depending on Au/rGO/1D-TN preparation method and reaction conditions. It has been demonstrated that interfacial contact between rGO/1D-TN and Au is crucial for high photocatalytic HY. Preparation method influences charge utilization, and hence HY, to a large extent. Nonetheless, the maximum HY reported in the present work is just comparable to HY reported in literature with the most commonly found spherical morphology, and this leads to a question of, is there any real influence of 1D and/or 2D materials, particularly, towards light harvesting applications?</p>},
	doi = {10.1002/slct.201600182},
	author = {Melvin, Ambrose A. and Bharad, Pradnya A. and Illath, Kavya and Lawrence, Meenu P. and Gopinath, Chinnakonda S.}
}
